T

"a system with the strongest bet selection"
 

Grid 3 System for Even Bets

by Izak Matatya

"has a strong flat bet advantage and works with any progression"

Here's a brand new system with a brand new concept  Grid 3 System for Even Bets.  It's one of the best systems having the strongest flat bet advantage. 

As the name implies, it explores all possibilities for a 3 decision segment or grid and gives you the best solution for winning on the long run betting nothing but 1 unit only throughout thousands of shoes and with no interruption.

In a 3-decision segment, you could have 8 combinations of wins and losses, which are:

1) L L L
2) L L W
3) L W L
4) L W W
5) W L L
6) W L W
7) W W L
8) W W W

On the long run, one should have an equal number of each such combination if you are always betting the same way.

If you would be betting 1 unit throughout, you would break even, because you have an equal number of wins and losses. 

If you would apply a progression of any type, you would also break even.

If you would interrupt your bets, say after one or two wins,  you would also break even.  Try it by inserting numbers and you will see.

And breaking even is without considering zeros in roulette or commissions in Baccarat, concluding that betting the same way all the time would yield to the house edge.

That's when creativity comes handy and Grid 3 system finds solutions for you to break this regularity of betting the same way and comes up with a very strong flat bet advantage. 

Grid 3 comes with 2 solid solutions each described under a different system, each presenting you a flat bet advantage.

Just to give you an idea, here's a performance chart of Grid 3 - System 1 for the second 500 shoe set of 1K Zumma shoes:

There are 408 more wins than losses, much better than breaking even. 

The first 500 shoes of the 1K Zumma set generates 277 units betting flat with 1 unit only.

Totaling both 500 shoe set, Grid 3 - System 1 generates 408 + 277 = 685 units for 1000 shoes.

With a small $10 unit size, this amounts to winning $6,850.

With flat bets you can bet any amount up to table's maximum. 

With $100 unit size, you win $68,500 for those shoes.

You should know that if a system has a flat bet advantage, it wins on progressions, too.

The beauty of the Grid 3 systems is that because the bet selection is so strong, that ANY progression of your choice will generate huge profits.

Say, you are using a 1, 2, 6, progression with $10 units or $10, $20, $60, 6 units being your highest bet amount, Grid 3 System 1 will generate:  $10,460 for the first 500 shoes set and another $14,450 for the second 500 shoes, totaling to $24,910 for 1000 shoes.

Since any progression will generate profits, chose the one with which you are comfortable with.  The system will take the 3 values of the progression as a parameter and you can experiment with any 3 values;
 

We just chose 8, 2, and 14, for instance and the system generated 4170 units for 500 shoes.

This is not really a progression but 3 values you chose to bet on each decision of the Grid 3, that is on 3 bets and you will see that ANY 3 values will work and will generate profits.  The flat betting profit will always be the same: 408 units for 500 shoes.

Grid 3 - System 2 will differ from system 1 in such a way, that the bet selection is fully dynamic and changes from bet to bet.  If it is more complex?  Not really.  Depending if you are winning or losing your bet, you will have a criterion on how the bet selection will change. 

System 2 will also provide a flat bet advantage.   And you could use any mild progression of your own, the same way as for System 1.

Here's a performance chart of System 2:

using the following parameters:

Generates $15,990, with 10, 20, 60 being $ values or 1, 2, 6 as the units of each step of the Grid 3 for 500 shoes with a unit size of $10. 

The other 500 shoes generate also   $10,500 for the same Grid values, totaling to $26,490 for 1000 shoes.

Betting flat, the first 500 shoes generate 207 units and the second 500 shoes generate 302, as you can see in the above table, totaling to 507 units for 1000 shoes. 

The flat bet advantage is a bit less than System 1.  However, the drawdown has been cut to 32 units only in System 2 versus 87 in System 1.

I'm sure you will like both systems and you will use either both or the one which appeals to you more.

Taking commissions into account, the system document will illustrate full examples on how you can make $10,000 within a few shoes.  And on the long run, the systems will generate each 1682 units for 500 shoes. 

Grid 3 - system 1 and 2 go for $4,500 and they are worth each penny. 

The system consists of 20 pages of easy reading and understanding and lots of examples, which will make it crystal clear. 

Upon your purchase you will receive the system document and three simulations: complete results for the 1000 Zumma shoes for System 1 and System 2 and a simulation showing how the system handles commissions.

The simulations are parametric, where you can enter the 3 values for the Grid of 3 decisions and witness that any 3 value will generate profits on the long run.  

As usual, your satisfaction is guaranteed and you have a full money back guarantee, should the system is not to your liking and you can return it within 30 days of your purchase, no strings attached and no questions asked.

You can directly buy the Grid 3 system for Even Bets from this link with the new order form and a download link will open right away after your payment online.

Wishing you all the best!
Izak Matatya

www.letstalkwinning.com
www.izakmatatya-digitalart.com

Email: webmaster@letstalkwinning.com, izak.matatya@videotron.ca or matatya.izak@gmail.com

Systems Gallery: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/gallery.htm
Newsletter: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/winalert.htm
Newsletter Archive: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/archive.htm
Recommended On-Line Casinos: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/bestonline.htm
Discussion Forum: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/forum/
Izak Matatya's new contemporary digital art online store:  https://www.izakmatatya-digitalart.com, www.izakmatatya.com

Frequently Asked Questions on the
Grid 3 System for Even Bets

by Izak Matatya

Here are the frequently asked questions and their answers you have been waiting for, since the announcement of the new Grid 3 system launched last month.

Q: How different is this system from your K.I.S.S from a few years ago?

A: KISS doesn’t tackle 3 decisions at a time, but bets according to the last 2 or 4 decisions and tends to catch chops and streaks, where the Grid 3 doesn’t. Grid 3 has a totally different concept and gives you a huge flat bet advantage, such as 500 units for 1000 shoes, whereas KISS wins 54% of all bets.

Q: Hi Izak. Your new Grid 3 System does seem to merit attention all right.

You show 32 unit drawdown in flat betting system #2. Seem this would escalate much higher when using a progression such as your 1,2 & 6 one. Would it not? If so...how much drawdown? I would need to know this in order to consider purchase.

Also seems the units gained flat betting system 1 would be nullified by the Banker commissions.

I would be interested in purchase if you can assure me of meaningful profits taking commissions into account. I would like to know how I would overcome those commissions.

A: The drawdown is 32 units actually with the 1 2 6 progression. 

Here are the specs: 

 In the flat bet version the drawdown is 31 units. 

 Now, taking commissions into account, the following are the parameters: 

 That’s true that in the flat bet version and with commissions, the profits are nullified.  That’s why in order to handle commissions we simply bet up to 6 units in one of the three decisions of the Grid 3.

 All full simulations of 1000 shoes will be provided upon your purchase, which show the details of every single bet.

Q: (Now, this is quite a question!!) 
Some of your systems may (and do) produce profits in the short term (this would not be a signal achievement as I have done so myself) and even in the "long term"- if their validation or "proof" in particular cases depends on applying them to a "standard" unchanging data series, especially ones judiciously or unconsciously selected to facilitate producing a "happy ending".  Take your first table, for example, representing results with your latest Grid 3 - System 1 applied to "the second 500 shoe set of 1K Zumma shoes", involving flat betting. To guarantee coming out on top playing these 500 shoes (some 40,000 hands or decisions), a player would have to play exactly the same shoes the same way in exactly the same order as in your Zumma collection. This would be so rare an event as to be, statistically speaking, virtually impossible.
What you, and anyone relying on any of your systems, which are in the main based on this and similar "standard" series of data, are fighting against, is not only the randomness within the games themselves, and in their sequencing within any series, but also the randomness that applies to the external behavior, and internal psychology, of players. The profits you demonstrate, which are based only on one unchanging series of unchanging games, I believe become illusory once the latter source of randomness is taken into account. All this makes it most unlikely that any purchaser will achieve consistent profits using any of your systems using your common approach. It also explains in my mind why you have to keep coming up with "new" systems to entice punters who have had disappointing results from past systems when seeking to apply them to real life situations in real visits to a casino. Let me elaborate further.  Staying with this particular second Zumma 500 series, lets imagine a player, one following your system who enters the series at the point represented by the 5000th decision, and stays till around the 9000th decision. This player would suffer a loss of some 130 units - after having sat through around 50 shoes, without sleep or even toilet or meal breaks!. Imagine this same defeated player, on the basis of your assurances, convinces himself to have another go and stay for the "long run" and, after marshalling his finances, re-joins the series at the point of the 23450th decision and, being eternally optimistic, and disregarding pleas from his long-suffering partner to come home, stays until the 25100th - involving a further 20 shoes or thereabouts. On the second visit, this "unlucky" player would have suffered a further loss of some 40 units - making a combined loss of around 170 units. Playing with $10 units, that would amount to a $1,700 loss and a $17,000 loss with $100 units, never mind the table maximum! The disaster would be multiplied should this player be "unlucky enough" to return again at points around 27000, 29000, 31000 and 32800!!
You may say that the scenario I have painted is very unlikely, but my response to that would be that it is no more unlikely in practice than a player arriving at the casino concerned and playing your 500 Zumma series in one sitting and winning 408 units! The same principles would apply to both of your so-called "Grid 3" systems.
Looking at both charts, then, for both betting systems, it is obvious that the experience the player has in the medium term - which is the time frame of all but the most severe uncontrolled addicts - depends upon the point at which the series used in the construction of the system is joined. I have already commented on the first chart. In similar fashion, in the chart representing System 2, the experience of anyone entering at points around 22690 and 31550 similarly would not be a good one.  In the light of the foregoing, the claim that "Taking commissions into account, the system document will illustrate full examples on how you can make $10,000 within a few shoes" seems particularly rash if not misleading - given that it all depends on where a player enters a series, and the nature of that series. I challenge you to demonstrate the claim for a player entering at the peak of 22690 in your second chart for example. Bear in mind that any proof you provide will be useful only if a player can find identical conditions in another series yet to be found at that player's unidentified local casino. I also challenge you to publish this correspondence in your website.

A: And surely I am publishing this correspondence, as promised, as it is quite interesting and challenging and my answer is the following:

Thank you for your elaborate email. And I see your points.

In every system, there will be good times and bad times. You have illustrated the bad moments, where a certain drawdown occurs.

I have no choice but to illustrate the entire 1000 or 500 shoe session and let people know what could happen during the time of their play.

I design systems, that show an end profit by the end of 500 or 1000 shoes. I had systems such as SOWS, which showed a more steady rising profit with less drawdowns in the session.

Each system will have different features and different performance levels.

I do make sure that I do not market a system, that shows negative results by the end of playing 1000 shoes.

And one does not have to play 1000 shoes in one sitting. That’s practically impossible. But whether one takes a lot of breaks and/or switches tables, the end result will be the same: by the end of playing 1000 shoes, one will end up with positive gains, regardless of some drawdowns that happen along the way.

Q: Can this system be used for even bets on Roulette? Does the Double 00 wheel have an influence on the results?

A: Yes, of course, this is good for all even bets. I have examples for Roulette upon your request. The tests have been performed on 00 wheels.

Q: Dear Izak

I've been through the introduction of New Grid 3 System. The profit of 1000 shoes of ZUMMA is really attractive. But there is one question that is the commission. Actually the highest rate of win of betting is all betting on B which is around 50.68% which is higher than 50%, but we still are beaten by Baccarat because of commission.

So i'm really wondering that with commission, what's the results of your 2 system and if we can use the system you introduce to beat the baccarat with the flat bet.

A: Sure, here are the results for using the system with commissions on 500 shoes: 

Despite some fluctuations an 8000 win target will be very achievable.

Thank you all for your interest and valuable questions.

As usual, your satisfaction is guaranteed and you have a full money back guarantee, should the system is not to your liking and you can return it within 30 days of your purchase, no strings attached and no questions asked.

You can directly buy the Grid 3 system for Even Bets from this link with the new order form and a download link will open right away after your payment online.

Wishing you all the best!
Izak Matatya

www.letstalkwinning.com
www.izakmatatya-digitalart.com

Email: webmaster@letstalkwinning.com, izak.matatya@videotron.ca or matatya.izak@gmail.com

Systems Gallery: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/gallery.htm
Newsletter: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/winalert.htm
Newsletter Archive: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/archive.htm
Recommended On-Line Casinos: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/bestonline.htm
Discussion Forum: http://www.letstalkwinning.com/forum/
Izak Matatya's new contemporary digital art online store:  https://www.izakmatatya-digitalart.com, www.izakmatatya.com

Use the Block 8 System for Even Bets by Izak Matatya at Midas Casino