Tips and strategies to help make you a winning casino player
Learn: Blackjack, Baccarat, Craps, Roulette, Slots, Video Poker, Pai Gow Poker,
Texas Hold'em, Caribbean Stud, Let It Ride, Casino War, Big Six, Sic Bo (NEW!)
Win more, more often with proven betting methods from the systems gallery
A secure on-line order form to purchase products advertised by Let's Talk
All about gambling at online casinos. Find out where the best deals are
Best Casino Bonuses - NEW!
The best collection of on-line casino bonuses, where you can
cash $802 on your sign-up.
Sign our guestbook, refer a friend, link to other gambling sites.
Gambling News - NEW!
Latest Gambling News - updated daily including gambling
articles, joke of the day and a gambling dictionary.
Click above to read the current
edition of our weekly newsletter. Then get your own free subscription right
here. Enter your e-mail address for immediate delivery of an introductory
issue, including a FREE ROULETTE SYSTEM by clicking
Please tell all
your friends about it.
Post a gambling question or opinion - get an answer .
Below is a selection of the most
On-Line Casino of the Month
Thursday, February 26, 2004
More on the Successful IBS Based
This is an addendum and follow up on the
newsletter of January 29, 2004,
where a successful IBS adaptation was shown.
Ervin who has come up with this variation
"I play the Casinos full time now.
It is all I do. IBS has made it possible. My luck may hit a rough spot but I
would have to lose 50 games in a row to get set back. I have accumulated a
bankroll of 2500 units, and every time I win it is gravy."
Monday I played my 100th live game. Now I am at 1 loss out of 100 games of
As I have said before I do not play a 100% mechanical game. I will
alter my bet selection if I feel I need to in order to win. But I do play a
nearly 100% mechanical game and I wanted to show you all what I am doing.
By the way a couple of people have been sending me emails and telling me how
they are doing with the 10-4 strategy and one of them is now at 1 loss in 40
games and the other is at 1 for 53. Both of them calculate the ratio in a
different way, but they get the same result.
I have tried to simplify it as much as possible. Most of the emails I have
gotten have been from individuals who do not understand the idea.
It is simple really.... You want to find the point where the side you are
betting on is showing less than 4 out of 10 hands. You do not want to bet on
a side where it is appearing less than that. The reason is because IBS will
lose unless you win at least 30% of the time.
I know that you cannot tell what is going to happen in a shoe. All I am
doing is trying to judge the present not the future and make a bet based on
my determinations. It seems to me that most of the time when there is a low
occurrence of Banker or Player hands it in the mist of a trend and will
continue to be low for just long enough to avoid a disaster.
Like I said I know you cannot predict what will happen. But 1 out of 100
tells me that the downturns come gradually and return gradually most of the
Andrea has won 1 in 40 or better bets until the hands decline below the
ratio. He stops and only then bets again if it climbs back up above 4
in 10. The point is what matters is knowing when the side you are betting on
is below the needed number of occurrences for IBS to work.
Below is a copy of my 100 game from Monday at Argosy. I have refined what I
am doing so that I only count the number of decisions when I am going to use
the progression to recover my losses which I do not do the whole game.
I start out betting 1 unit then I bet 2 units. If I lose both bets then I go
into the progression. I bet for chops. I play both Banker and Player.
I do not bet the first decision unless I need to bet on both to get going.
If the first decision is a Player then I would bet 1 unit that the next hand
will be a Banker. Just like KISS. If I get two
Players in a row I will bet 2 units that the next will be a Player again. If
it wins I go back to betting for the Chop. If I get 4 of the same kind in a
row I do not try for same again like on two in a row I try for the Chop.
When I lose my first 2 bets in a row I start my IBS string not 1-2 but
1-1-1. I am not trying to gain one unit with IBS. I am trying to recover my
losses. I normally play using the way Izak described in the thread "IBS
50 unit bankroll", but you don't have to. You can do it with any
variation you like.
When I have hit the two losses before I start using IBS I will look at the
hand that beat me. Is it a Player or Banker? Let's say it is a Player. I
will count back 10 hands. If Player is showing 4 or less in the last
10 hands then I will pick Banker to make my recovery. Otherwise I will
use the side that beat me.
Let me stop here. One of the biggest reasons I believe I have won so many
games lately is because I will not try to recover losses a lot of times
simply because I am not down and I don't need to. When I play with real
money I am very much set on never risking money when I don't have to.
I think I play a great game but it is still gambling and even if I win 1000
games without a loss I will never start risking my bankroll without
considering everything I have learned about the game and my present
situation and making a thoughtful and careful decision to bet or not to bet.
This is the non-mechanical part of the game. The rest is almost all playing
by the numbers so to speak. There maybe nothing much to the 10 - 4 counting
strategy, but I don't care, because it helps me stop and consider what I am
about to do. When I do the count, I know the side I am about to start
betting on has not been showing enough to win using the wagering method I am
about to employ, so why do it? It may change in the next series of
decisions. But you can only work with what you know, not what may or
may not happen.
You see I do not accept the idea of discipline as a goal. Discipline to me
is a result of confidence in a conclusion. Much like reward is the result of
labor. I think people who set rules for themselves and then attempt to live
by disciplining themselves to be obedient are just plain lazy. They would
rather not have to find an answer that satisfies their uncertainty
sufficiently and act with full faith in their conclusion, because it is more
difficult than just picking a rule and following it. But that is a debate
for a religious forum.
I hope this explains everything. This is the best I can do. With the example
I am giving you it should be enough. I play the Casinos full time now. It is
all I do. IBS has made it possible. My luck my hit a rough spot but I would
have to lose 50 games in a row to get set back. I have accumulated a
bankroll of 2500 units and every time I win it is gravy. The way I figure it
even if by some evil turn of fate I was wiped out all I need is 50 units to
start over again. I can go find a job and make that in a month no big deal.
Here is an example of how I play:
Bc 26 -1.3 Total +28.7
Mon / Feb / 23 / 04 Argosy Casino: 1 Mini Bac. Table
Hand #/ decision / bet on P-B amount W-L
/ string /amount W-L/ score /
2. P P1W 1-0 +1 +1
3. B B1W 1-0 +1 +2
4. P P1W 1-0 +1 +3
5. B B1W 1-0 +1 +4
6. B P1L 1-1 -1 +3
7. P B2L 1-1-1 -2 +1 - (3 in 7 - P)
8. B P1L 1-1-1-1 -1 0
9. B P1L 1-1-1-1-1 -1 -1
10. P P1W 1-1-1-1 +1 0
11. P P4W 1-0 +4 +4
12. B B1W 1-0 +1 +5
13. P P1W 1-0 +1 +6
14. B B1W 1-0 +1 +7
15. B P1L 1-1 -1 +6
16. B B2W 1-0 +2 +8
17. P P1W 1-0 +1 +9
18. P B1L 1-1 -1 +8
19. P P2W 1-0 +2 +10
20. B B1W 1-0 +1 +11
21. P P1W 1-0 +1 +12
22. P B1L 1-1 -1 +11
23. P P2W 1-0 +2 +13
24. B B1W 1-0 +1 +14
25. P P1W 1-0 +1 +15
26. B B1W 1-0 +1 +16
27. B P1L 1-1 -1 +15
28. B B2W 1-0 +2 +17
29. P P1W 1-0 +1 +18
30. B B1W 1-0 +1 +19
31. B P1L 1-1 -1 +18
32. P B2L 1-1-1 -2 +16 - (4 in 10 - B)
33. B B1W 1-1 +1 +17
34. P B2L 1-1-1 -2 +15
35. P B1L 1-1-1-1 -1 +14
36. B B1W 1-1-1 +1 +15
37. B B3W 1-0 +3 +18 - resume
38. P P1W 1-0 +1 +19
39. B B1W 1-0 +1 +20
40. B P1L 1-1 -1 +19
41. B B2W 1-0 +2 +21
42. P P1W 1-0 +1 +22
43. P B1L 1-1 -1 +21
44. P P2W 1-0 +2 +23
45. B B1W 1-0 +1 +24
46. P P1W 1-0 +1 +25
47. P B1L 1-1 -1 +24
48. B P2L 1-1-1 -2 +22 - (5 in 10 - B)
49. B B1W 1-1 +1 +23
50. B B2W 1-0 +2 +25 - resume
51. P P1W 1-0 +1 +26
52. P B1L 1-1 -1 +25
53. P P2W 1-0 +2 +27
54. P B1L 1-1 -1 +26
55. B B2W 1-0 +2 +28
56. B P1L 1-1 -1 +27
57. P B2L 1-1-1 -2 +25 - (5 in 10 - P)
58. B P1L 1-1-1-1 -1 +24
59. P P1W 1-1-1 +1 +25
60. P P3W 1-0 +3 +28-resume
61. P P1W 1-0 +1 +29
62. P B1L 1-1 -1 +28
63. P B2L 1-1-1 -2 +26 - (7 in 10 - P)
64. B P1L 1-1-1-1 -1 +25
65. P P1W 1-1-1 +1 +27
66. B P3L 1-1-1-3 -3 +24
67. P P6W 1-0 +6 +30 - resume
68. P B1L 1-1 -1 +29
69. P P2W 1-0 +2 +31
70. P B1L 1-1 -2 +30 - End
Just a note to add. When I am in a
recover mode, because I missed my first 2 bets, I count the last 10
decisions and even though I didn't write it down, I follow my count and I
will stop my recovery sometimes if it gets down below 4 and wait for it to
come back and sometimes I just switch to the other side.
I don't have a set rule but if I had to choose which I do most I would say I
follow the count and go with the side that is showing the strongest.
Most of the shoes I play it seems that I get into IBS on average 4 times per
shoe. I try my best to make the first 2 bets win and I have won some shoes
without ever losing the second bet.
In the example above I did not make the last 2 recovery attempts when I was
playing in the Casino. I was up a considerable amount and I saw no reason to
Thanking Ervin again for his most valuable input.
Wishing you all the best,
|WOULD YOU LIKE
TO SUBSCRIBE? Click here.
If you missed any
newsletter, click here for an archive.